Gary Bolles

Summary

Gary A. Bolles is a globally recognized thought leader and consultant focused on the rapidly evolving landscape of work, education, and organizational transformation in the post-pandemic era driven by exponential technologies. He provides invaluable guidance to individuals, companies, communities and nations looking to navigate uncertainty and flourish in the years ahead.

– Chair for the Future of Work for SU
– Partner at the consulting firm Charrette LLC
– Co-founder of eParachute.com
– Currently focus on strategies for the future of work, learning, and the organization. Deeply committed to helping catalyze inclusive capitalism.
– Formerly, co-founder, SoCap:SocialCapitalMarkets and a dozen other impact initiatives.
– Former editorial director of six technology publications
– Former VP Marketing and COO.

Source: Singularity webpage

OnAir Post: Gary Bolles

About

Biography

Bolles encapsulated his extensive research and consulting insights in his acclaimed book, The Next Rules of Work, which lays out the essential mindset, skillset and toolset needed to lead organizations successfully through disruptive change. He delves into these crucial topics further in his widely read LinkedIn newsletter.

As a highly sought-after speaker, Bolles delivers over 100 keynotes and interviews annually. His “firestarter” sessions galvanize C-suite leaders to radically rethink their approach to work, learning and organizational reinvention. Global clients like Google, Novartis, The World Bank, and the U.N. frequently bring him in to share his cutting-edge perspectives. He is also a regular faculty member for Singularity University, Gartner and Unreasonable Group.

In his role as Chair for the Future of Work at Singularity University, Bolles spearheads initiatives to equip a worldwide community with the frameworks, capabilities and connections to create a future of abundance in work and lifelong learning. He emphasizes the importance of developing shared understanding, collaborative strategy and universal access to opportunity as we navigate the momentous shift to the digital work economy.

Through the boutique firm Charrette LLC, Bolles helps clients identify and interpret pivotal trends reshaping organizations and markets. He facilitates strategic conferences, innovation consulting, strategy design workshops and collaborative initiatives to devise proactive responses. Notable projects include co-founding the US Broadband Coalition, which united 137 entities to create a national connectivity plan, and advising an international clientele spanning Google to the New Zealand government.

Drawing on his early training as a career counselor, Bolles co-founded eParachute.com to provide online and in-person support to job seekers and career changers of all ages. He leverages the acclaimed methodology of What Color is Your Parachute?, the bestselling career guide of all time authored by his father Richard, to help people navigate professional transitions.

Bolles has also created some of LinkedIn Learning’s most popular courses, teaching over 1.3 million students about cultivating learning agility, a growth mindset, and leading the future of work. His extensive background spans executive roles in software startups, strategic advisory for Nokia, and editorial leadership for pioneering tech publications and TV shows.

A prolific convenor, Bolles has co-founded numerous groundbreaking events like SOCAP, the leading conference for impact investing; Fulcrum, focused on future of work solutions; and Global Skills Day. He also serves as a program architect shaping high-profile events for Google, Singularity University, TED and other major clients.

Source: Singularity webpage

Web Links

ITDF Essay, April 2025

This essay was written in January 2025 in reply to the question: Over the next decade, what is likely to be the impact of AI advances on the experience of being human? How might the expanding interactions between humans and AI affect what many people view today as ‘core human traits and behaviors’? This and nearly 200 additional essay responses are included in the 2025 report Being Human in 2035.

AI Presents an Opportunity to Liberate Humanity but New Norms in Human-Machine Communication Seem More Likely to Diminish Human-to-Human Connections

Source: ITDF Webpage

“Due to the wide range of products in use in 2025, we already have extensive experience with the effects of technology on our individual and collective humanity. Each of us today has the opportunity to take advantage of the wisdom of the ages, and to learn – from each other and through our tools – how we can become even more connected, both to our personal humanity and to each other.

“We also know that many of us spend a significant amount of our waking hours looking at a screen and inserting technology between each other, with the inherent erosion of the social contract that our insulating technologies can catalyze. That erosion can only increase as our technologies emulate human communications and characteristics.

The design of software we use today already begins to blur the line between what comes from a human and what is created by our tools. Today’s chat interface is a deliberate attempt to hack the human mind … personifying communication with humans and referring to itself with human pronouns.  … The line-blurring will accelerate rapidly with the sale of semi-autonomous AI agents fueled by Silicon Valley CEOs and venture capitalists calling these technologies ‘co-bots,’ ‘co-workers,’ ‘managers,’ ‘AI engineers’ and a ‘digital workforce.’

“There will be tremendous benefits from ubiquitous generative AI software that can dramatically increase our ability to learn, to have mental and emotional support from flexible applications and to have access to egalitarian tools that can help empower those among us with the least access and opportunity. But the design of software we use today already begins to blur the line between what comes from a human and what is created by our tools.

“For example, today’s chat interface is a deliberate attempt to hack the human mind. Rather than simply providing a full page of response, a chatbot ‘hesitates’ and then ‘types’ its answer. And the software encourages personifying communication with humans, referring to itself with human pronouns.

“The line between human and technology will blur even more as AI voice interfaces proliferate, and as the quality of generated video becomes so good that distinguishing human from software will become difficult even for experts. While many will use this as an opportunity in the next 10 years to reinforce our individual and collective humanity, many will find it hard to avoid personifying the tools, seduced by the siren song of software that simulates humans  –  with none of the frictions and accommodations that are inevitable parts of authentic human relationships.

By elevating our technologies the inevitable result is that we diminish humans. For example, every time we call a piece of software ‘an AI,’ we should hear a bell ringing, as we make another dollar for a Silicon Valley company. It doesn’t have to be that way. For the first time in human history, with AI-related technologies we have the capacity to help every human on the planet to learn more rapidly and effectively, to connect more deeply and persistently and to solve so many of the problems that have plagued humanity for millennia. And we have an opportunity to co-create a deeper understanding of what human intelligence is, and what humanity can become.

“That line-blurring will accelerate rapidly with the sale of semi-autonomous AI agents. Fueled by Silicon Valley CEOs and venture capitalists calling these technologies ‘cobots,’ ‘co-workers,’ ‘managers,’ ‘AI engineers’ and a ‘digital workforce,’ these techno-champions have economic incentives to encourage heavily-marketed and deeply-confusing labels that will quickly find their way into daily language. Many children already are confused by Amazon’s Alexa, automatically anthropomorphizing the technology. How much harder will it be for human workers to resist language that labels their tools as their ‘co-workers’ and fall into the trap of thinking of both humans and AI software as ‘people’?

“We are likely to make significant strides forward on all these fronts in the next 10 years. But at the same time, we must confront the sheer power of these technologies to erode the very definition of what it is to be human, because that’s what will happen if we allow these products to continue along the pernicious path of personification. I think we are better than that. I think we can teach our children and each other that it is our definition and understanding of humanity that defines us as a species. And I believe we can shape our tools to help us to become better humans.”

 

Skip to toolbar